Being principles-based, it's very, very laser-focused.
It’s not a floodlight because it’s not like, “Well, we’ve got to work on passing because we turn the ball over.”
Well, our turnovers are very specific.
I mean, how are we on relocations?
Are we making the right reads on finish or find, QB12 like you would say.
I mean, it becomes really specific and narrow, and that’s helpful.
I had a great, great coach on my staff who’d been coaching for many years,
and he’d say, “Jon, we keep turning the ball over.”
I said, got it, yeah. Knowledge of results.
We see that now. Why are we doing it?
And without any kind of set, if we’re running four offenses or five offenses,
we can do some diagnosing of that.
But if you’re running one thing principles based, it becomes very easy now to critique players and ourselves, how we teach it, and say, well, we’re not filling the finisher at all.
We’ve got to emphasize that.
We’ll break it down: 3v3 or 3v0:
It’s got to go to the Hub (or Playmaker), two cuts, then a relocation, drive and kick, then play.
We started practicing that Thursday.
You got to have these things before we can score.
And if you score off a layup, it’s +3, everything else is +1.
The constraint games Coach Huggins is describing is what yesterday's paid post breaks down. Six of them, with setup, rules, coaching cues, and progressions.
